EVE Search - CSM 9 Results

Check My IP Information

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

CSM 9 Results

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
Josef Djugashvilis Acme Mining Corporation 2318	Posted - 2014.05.03 18:45:00 - [1] - Quote Abrazzar wrote: Who are those people? I recognize four of the names, not sure if that is a good or a bad thing. This is not a signature.
Josef Djugashvilis Acme Mining Corporation 2318	Posted - 2014.05.03 18:49:00 - [2] - Quote Rhes wrote: Proletariat Tingtango wrote: Cygnet Lythanea wrote: Proletariat Tingtango wrote: Bloc vote success. See, this is the sort of thing that makes people think Dinsdale is RIGHT... The conspiracy to silence hi-sec is real. If we silence them we can't hear them wail. Probably because the hi-sec wails are drowned out by the constant wailing about hi-sec from Jenn Awhine, Baltec 1 and La Nariz , oh, and that Kaarous person. This is not a signature.
Josef Djugashvilis Acme Mining Corporation 2318	Posted - 2014.05.03 19:35:00 - [3] - Quote baltec1 wrote: Josef Djugashvilis wrote: Probably because the hi-sec wails are drowned out by the constant wailing about hi-sec from Jenn Awhine, Baltec 1 and La Nariz , oh, and that Kaarous person. Most of the stuff we point out as being broken is being fixed Democracy works. Sometimes This is not a signature.
Josef Djugashvilis Acme Mining Corporation 2321	Posted - 2014.05.04 12:16:00 - [4] - Quote Khanh'rhh wrote: We even called our voting list "Down with highsec" heh. I guess you get to crawl about in the dirt for another 12 months. Oh grow up for god's sake. This is not a signature.
Josef Djugashvilis Acme Mining Corporation 2325	Posted - 2014.05.04 16:08:00 - [5] - Quote Aryth wrote: Our ballot gets more effective each year coordinating with other groups. Its almost like learning from the past and adapting behavior for optimal results is a good thing. Or you could just shoot at rocks under concord protection all day and hope the bleating gets you something. Or you could spam the forms and hope your bleating gets you something. Oh the goons do that already This is not a signature.
Josef Djugashvilis Acme Mining Corporation 2326	Posted - 2014.05.04 18:01:00 - [6] - Quote Aryth wrote: Josef Djugashvilis wrote: Aryth wrote: Our ballot gets more effective each year coordinating with other groups. Its almost like learning from the past and adapting behavior for optimal results is a good thing. Or you could just shoot at rocks under concord protection all day and hope the bleating gets you something. Or you could spam the forms and hope your bleating gets you something. Oh the goons do that already Looks like one of our behaviors is working too eh? Enlighten me, what have the goons 'persuaded' CCP' to do, that they would not have otherwise done? I suspect that goons try to take credit where none is due. This is not a signature.
Josef Djugashvilis Acme Mining Corporation 2326	Posted - 2014.05.04 19:40:00 - [7] - Quote La Nariz wrote: Josef Djugashvilis wrote: Aryth wrote: Our ballot gets more effective each year coordinating with other groups. Its almost like learning from the past and adapting behavior for optimal results is a good thing. Or you could just shoot at rocks under concord protection all day and hope the bleating gets you something. Or you could spam the forms and hope your bleating gets you something. Oh the goons do that already You pubbies started it, you should have known better than to start a forum war against a forum community. Hey mom. it was him wot stared it not me This is not a signature.
Josef Djugashvilis Acme Mining Corporation 2327	Posted - 2014.05.05 05:00:00 - [8] - Quote Andski wrote: Dalloway Jones wrote: So the people who claim that high sec should be wiped out are the same people who come to the forums and cry when a cloaked ship is sitting in a system all day, right? hiseccers just come to the forums and cry because the possibility exists that they might someday lose a ship Andski, even by your admittedly low standards of forum posting, this is nonsense, even more so because you know it is nonsense. This is not a signature.
Josef Djugashvilis Acme Mining Corporation 2329	Posted - 2014.05.05 06:21:00 - [9] - Quote Andski wrote: Josef Djugashvilis wrote: Andski, even by your admittedly low standards of forum posting, this is nonsense, even more so because you know it is nonsense. it's a shame that i'm right because if you visit F&I or GD on any given day, you'll see at least three threads asking for wardecs to be nerfed to the point where they only exist in name, asking for concord buffs or for some other nerfs to hisec aggression Okay, I'll go with your figures for the sake of argument. 21 threads a week wanting - demanding - whinging, hi-sec to be 'safer' etc. The majority of Eve players play in hi-sec, so I can live with 21 of them a week starting threads wanting a safer hi-sec. This 21, are a tiny minority, some of whom will be brand spanking new players who will soon come to their senses, some of them will be pixel hard-men alts setting up h-sec to take a hit and some of them are playing the wrong game. I can live with that, so can CCP Market forces and all that my dear chap, if hi-sec is so bad for the game, why does it have most of the players? This is not a signature.
Josef Djugashvilis Acme Mining Corporation 2330	Posted - 2014.05.05 08:13:00 - [10] - Quote Malcanis wrote: I'll say this for Dinsdale: at least he doesn't run around bleating that "The CSM are useless". His faith in our effectiveness was often inspiring. If there is indeed a cartel operating to get CCP to kill hi-sec, it is, to put it mildly, a failure. This is not a signature.

Josef Djugashvilis Acme Mining Corporation 2330	Posted - 2014.05.05 13:25:00 - [11] - Quote La Nariz wrote: Josef Djugashvilis wrote: Andski wrote: Dalloway Jones wrote: So the people who claim that high sec should be wiped out are the same people who come to the forums and cry when a cloaked ship is sitting in a system all day, right? hiseccers just come to the forums and cry because the possibility exists that they might someday lose a ship Andski, even by your admittedly low standards of forum posting, this is nonsense, even more so because you know it is nonsense. If we don't communicate down on your level you won't understand what we're saying. Dear La Nariz...your response says more about you than I would wish to say whilst staying within the forum rules really... On the bright side, it is great that really young folk like you play Eve, it helps to ensure the game has a future if you stick with it. Take care. This is not a signature.
Josef Djugashvilis Acme Mining Corporation 2334	Posted - 2014.05.05 16:24:00 - [12] - Quote Khanh'rhh wrote: I Have 18Accounts wrote: This battle in your minds where all us "pubbies" gather around plotting for your destruction is just that; a battle in your minds. I specifically stated that you are neither willing nor able to "plot" - did you read my post? If you're denying there's lots of anti-goon hatred on here, and elsewhere, let me know how many examples I need to quote. You would have to have some serious reading comprehension issues to have not seen them before, mind. Try not to mistake laughing at goons in the forums with goons for anti-goon hatred. Still, if you want to think folk hate the goons, don't let me stop you. This is not a signature.
Josef Djugashvilis Acme Mining Corporation 2334	Posted - 2014.05.05 16:41:00 - [13] - Quote Khanh'rhh wrote: Josef Djugashvilis wrote: Khanh'rhh wrote: I Have 18Accounts wrote: This battle in your minds where all us "pubbies" gather around plotting for your destruction is just that; a battle in your minds. I specifically stated that you are neither willing nor able to "plot" - did you read my post? If you're denying there's lots of anti-goon hatred on here, and elsewhere, let me know how many examples I need to quote. You would have to have some serious reading comprehension issues to have not seen them before, mind. Try not to mistake laughing at goons in the forums with goons for anti-goon hatred. Still, if you want to think folk hate the goons, don't let me stop you. Duuuuuuuuuude. You were meant to reply with the other alt. Now everyone can see your "+1 to this guy!" post was yourself. This is pretty awkward now. You are La Nairz' younger brother right? This is not a signature.
Josef Djugashvilis Acme Mining Corporation 2334	Posted - 2014.05.05 18:05:00 - [14] - Quote baltec1 wrote: Jaxon Grylls wrote: baltec1 wrote: We talk to people the same way they talk to us. Then claim the moral high ground and refuse to indulge in such activities. Or could it be that you really enjoy all the angst and dislike? Just like Millwall football club supporters. They have a chant "Everybody hates us, we don't care." I suspect that deep down they do care. Same with you. We care about this game to shoot down all of the terrible ideas some people have. Does your foot hurt? Sorry, could not resist the obvious rejoinder This is not a signature.
Josef Djugashvilis Acme Mining Corporation 2334	Posted - 2014.05.05 18:11:00 - [15] - Quote Rhes wrote: Dinsdale Pirannha wrote: King Fu Hostile wrote: Dinsdale Piranha wrote: More like the removal of all loot from missions, and the buffing of the Incursion rats, making the sites take longer to finish. these are pretty good suggestions mate It is not like I am giving the CSM ideas. These directives, and more, have already delivered to the CCP dev's. Like I have said before, every pilot generating PvE income in high sec is someone not paying a tithe to the cartel leaders, and they can't have that. Just wait until Level 4 missions get removed from high sec. The crying will be...breathtaking. Whatever will the null-sec alts do if it should happen? Look chaps, no matter how often you spam the forums with ideas you want CCP to implement to create your version of Eve Online, you know that CCP ignore your rants against hi-sec as much as we find them amusing. This is not a signature.
Josef Djugashvilis Acme Mining Corporation 2334	Posted - 2014.05.05 18:12:00 - [16] - Quote Mike Azariah wrote: When did this degenerate into another Grr Gons thread? and why? You have a council, find the man or woman who will represent you the best. Contact them ask them questions. How they reply, how they listen . . . THAT is what is important. Not what a select few of trolls in this thread are doing. Might as well say I am 'fighting for the removal of complexes and escalations from null and wormhole space'* as they are only to be PvP. All PvE activities must be in highsec, right? right? Low only kind of counts so I guess they can have some things. No Wild death of any section of space is not what the council is for. Sorry, I wish I could make you all tinfoil hats so you could protect yourselves. Back to the council composition. What part of space do you think is missed in representation? Or did we finally manage to get diversity? m * - I am not fighting to make massive changes to remove parts of the game If the goons stop spamming the forums, I for one, promise to stop making fun of them. This is not a signature.
Josef Djugashvilis Acme Mining Corporation 2336	Posted - 2014.05.06 05:56:00 - [17] - Quote To the anti hi-sec folk. Players do not have to play in hi-sec, yet they choose of their own free will to do so. In fact the majority of players choose to play in hi-sec. Anti hi-sec folk may argue that this is because hi-sec is safer and easier to earn isk in than null-sec. I agree with them, (for the most part) the problem the anti hi-sec folk have is that the majority of players seem to like this arrangement. Some of the null-sec folk appear to seriously believe that if CCP did away with hi-sec entirely that subs to the game would increase would increase, what evidence they have for this eludes me completely. I am of the opinion that we all play Eve Online and that where we choose to do so is immaterial. Each to their own and all that. Anti hi-sec folk are just going to have to come to terms with the fact that CCP has no intentions of doing away with hi-sec, not today, not tomorrow, not ever. This is not a signature.
Josef Djugashvilis Acme Mining Corporation 2337	Posted - 2014.05.06 10:37:00 - [18] - Quote Pubbie Spy wrote: Tauranon wrote: As it stands, it is not a balanced game, nor is it a game that lays out a proper progression path for users, and its probably a reason why 6 month old mission runners unsub - other steps are seen as unrewarding and they are bored with missions. Eve is not about ~progression~, since making numbers go up faster with a more expensive ship is just more of the same. There's a reason the most memorable moments in Eve are not at all related to player SP or how many purple modules your mission running autism chariot has, but about drama and large scale changes in the political landscape of nullsec and giant fights where thousands of people were sufficiently motivated to log in and play internet spaceships together. Go play WoW or Asteroids (still a better rock shooting game than mining in Eve) if you want PvE. Jaxon Grylls wrote: Josef Djugashvilis wrote: If the goons stop spamming the forums, I for one, promise to stop making fun of them. No, not good enough Josef. Don't get caught up in the silly games being played here. This thread is degenerating into a play-ground squabble. This does no-one any good, only serves to entrench the two camps and will lead inevitably to a lock. As I advised the Goon representatives, give it a rest. Post constructively or don't post at all. Mike Azariah is right. Let's see what this CSM does, before coming out with visions of doom. Your style of paragraphs for each sentence is very readable and makes your post much more constructive. Thank you good sir Glad to help This is not a signature.
Josef Djugashvilis Acme Mining Corporation 2338	Posted - 2014.05.06 13:06:00 - [19] - Quote Jaxon Grylls wrote: Pubbie Spy wrote: Your style of paragraphs for each sentence is very readable and makes your post much more constructive. Sorry if it offends you. My eyes are not what they were and I find that single spacing is often hard to read. So when composing a post I do it in such a manner that is easy for me to proof-read and spell check. I was not offended in the least. This is not a signature.
Josef Djugashvilis Acme Mining Corporation 2348	Posted - 2014.05.08 19:39:00 - [20] - Quote Have CCP released the actual voting totals yet? This is not a signature.